Skip to content
Graviti
AvailableLLMGR-LLM-02

Human Preference Pairs

Pairwise and graded comparisons for RLHF, DPO and reward modeling.

Comparisons
400,000+
Avg. turns
4.2
Agreement
0.78 κ
PAIR 118,402 · TURN 3 / 4κ = 0.78RESPONSE AHELPFULHONESTHARMLESSRESPONSE BCHOSENHELPFULHONESTHARMLESSRATIONALE: B STATES ITS ASSUMPTIONS AND CORRECTLY FLAGS THE EDGE CASE.

Illustrative rendering of annotation layers.

01Overview

Multi-turn conversations with pairwise preferences, Likert ratings and written rationales from trained raters. Covers helpfulness, honesty, harmlessness, instruction following and style, with inter-rater agreement reported per slice.

Modalities

  • Text
  • Multi-turn dialogue

Use cases

  • Reward model training
  • Direct preference optimization
  • Safety tuning

02Specification

Content

Format
Prompt, two candidate responses, preference, rationale
Ratings
Pairwise preference + 7-point Likert per axis
Axes
Helpfulness, honesty, harmlessness, instruction following, style

03Schema

FieldTypeDescription
conversationlist<Message>Shared conversation prefix.
chosenMessagePreferred response.
rejectedMessageDispreferred response.
scoresmap<string, int>Per-axis Likert ratings.
rationalestringRater explanation.

04File structure

Directory layout
preference-pairs/
├── data_card.md
└── pairs/
    └── part-0000.parquet

05Sample

Evaluate before you license.

  • 1,000 comparisons
  • Rater guidelines
Size
≈ 12 MB
Formats
Parquet, JSONL
Download sample

06License

Graviti Commercial Data License

Commercial training rights.

How we license data →

Related datasets

Get started

Need more than Human Preference Pairs?

We extend catalog datasets with new environments, tasks, languages and annotation layers — or collect from scratch to your spec.